SolutionAI for legal teams

AI Legal Assistant, answers with sources.

An AI assistant for Thai legal officers. It researches legislation and judgments, analyses contracts and official letters, checks regulatory obligations and studies cases, and cites the section behind every point.

Open the workspace See the AI workflows

Legal research
Document analysis
Regulatory compliance
Case analysis

The AI Legal Assistant workspace. The sample question and answer cite real statutes and can be tried in the live demo below.

The context

Legal work runs on finding the right text, and trusting it.

Legal teams work from statutes, regulations, contracts, opinions and case files. The AI opportunity is to find the right passage faster and show exactly where every answer came from.

Codified law

Thai law is largely codified, with the Civil and Commercial Code at its core, so much legal work starts with finding the right provision.

Thai first

Legislation and court work are in Thai, so search and answers must handle Thai well. The workspace answers in Thai and English.

Personal data rules

Case files hold personal data. The Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019), where it applies, and each agency's own rules shape who may see what.

Courts and prosecutors

Built for courts, prosecutors and legal teams in Thailand.

General background, not legal advice. Specific rules, systems and volumes will come from the agencies during discovery.

What is the current issue?

Four modes, one shared problem: the right text is hard to find and hard to trust.

The issues under each area are working hypotheses to test with legal teams, not findings.

Legal research

Questions answered from legislation and judgments

Statutes, amendments and judgments sit in different places, so finding the right section depends on knowing where to look.
Keyword search misses passages that say the same thing in other words.
General AI chat tools answer without section citations, so they cannot be relied on.

AI opportunity. A question in plain Thai or English, answered with the governing sections, supporting judgments and the points to verify.

See the research screen

Document analysis

Contracts, regulations and official letters checked for legality and risk

Long contracts and letters are read end to end to find risky or unlawful terms.
Scanned or photographed documents have to be retyped before they can be checked.
Suggested wording changes are drafted by hand, clause by clause.

AI opportunity. Upload a PDF, Word file or scan, or paste the text, and get legality and risk findings with suggested redlines.

See the document screen

Regulatory compliance

A checklist of duties for a business or project

One project can touch many laws, and the full list of licences and duties is rarely in one place.
It is hard to tell which authority issues which licence.
Penalties are spread across each Act's own chapters.

AI opportunity. Describe the business or project and get the obligations, licences, authorities and penalties as one checklist.

See the compliance screen

Case analysis

Judgments on similar facts and the likely outcome

Finding judgments with similar facts means reading many decisions.
The governing principle is buried in long reasoning.
Early advice on a likely outcome depends on the individual's experience.

AI opportunity. Describe the facts and get the governing principles, comparable judgments and a likely tendency, marked as not a ruling.

See the case screen

How can AI help?

AI-driven workflows that end with a person's decision.

Each workflow starts from work legal teams already do. Retrieval and extraction do the reading, an AI agent drafts, and a named person decides.

From a question to a cited answer

A legal officer asks in plain words and gets the governing sections, supporting judgments and the points to check.

1 Legal officer
Asks in plain words
Types the question in Thai or English, or picks an example.
2 AI retrieval
Finds the sections
Searches legislation and judgments and ranks the passages that matter.
3 AI agent
Writes from the sources
Answers under fixed headings, with a numbered citation on each point.
4 Legal officer
Checks the sources
Opens the cited sections and reads the points to verify.
5 Outcome
Research on file
The answer can be copied, rated, or saved to a case after login.

Tools the assistant calls

search_legislation(query)
search_judgments(facts)
cite_section(act, ref)
save_research(case)

Illustrative function names for a pilot design.

Today

Search each source separately, then read whole Acts and judgments to find the section that matters.

With AI

One question, a structured answer with citations, and a clear list of what still needs checking.

The intelligence layer

One platform under all four modes.

The four modes share one data layer and one set of AI services, so each new use reuses what is already built. Data flows up, and citations and checks wrap every step.

Legal sources
Legislation and judgments, with citations kept
- Acts and codes
- Royal Decrees and regulations
- Supreme Court judgments
- Official translations
Data layer
Clean, split, labelled
- Thai text and OCR
- Section splitting
- Citation labels
- File upload, up to 40 MB
Intelligence
Retrieval finds the passages, the model writes from them with citations
- Search and ranking
- Extraction
- Risk and redline checks
- Grounded answers
- AI agent, Thai and English
What people use
One workspace, four modes
- Legal research
- Document analysis
- Regulatory compliance
- Case analysis
- Saved research by case

What would the user see?

The legal workspace.

This is the AI Legal Assistant interface. Pick one of four modes, ask in Thai or English, and read an answer that cites the sections and judgments behind it.

Click an example question
Click a numbered citation
Switch between ไทย and EN
Try Document analysis

What would you like to research today?

Ask a legal question. The system searches legislation and judgments and answers with section citations.

Examples

Legal officers
Cited answers to routine legal questions, with the sections to read.
Contract and document reviewers
Risk findings and suggested redlines for a draft.
Compliance and project teams
A checklist of licences, duties and authorities for a project.
Lawyers who sign off
Comparable judgments and a likely tendency, with the points to verify.

Key screens

One screen for each mode.

Each screen is the real workspace, opened on one mode with a sample answer, and it works on its own. The sample answers are pre-written demonstrations, not legal advice.

Click a numbered citation, or open Sources cited.

You

Who should a victim sue when a state official commits a wrongful act on duty?

AI assistant

Issue

Who should a victim sue when a state official commits a wrongful act in the course of duty?

Applicable law

Act on Liability for Wrongful Acts of Officials, B.E. 2539 (1996), Sections 5, 6 and 7.

Analysis

Under Section 5, when a wrongful act is committed by an official in the course of duty, the state agency bears liability to the injured person. The injured person may sue the state agency directly, but may not sue the official (unofficial translation).

The Act's preamble explains the aim: to remove the misconception that officials must always bear personal liability for acts done in the course of duty for the agency's benefit .

If the act is not committed in the course of duty, Section 6 makes the official personally liable, and the injured person may sue the official directly but not the state agency .

Section 7 adds a procedural route: the party sued may apply to the court to summon the other party into the lawsuit .

Supporting judgments

Supreme Court Judgment No. 3648/2549 held that under Section 5 the state agency bears liability for wrongful acts of its officials in the course of duty, and the injured person may sue the agency directly but not the official .

Contrasting judgments

None retrieved.

Likely tendency (not a ruling)

Strong. The statutory rule is explicit: when the wrongful act is in the course of duty, the victim must sue the state agency. The key factual question is whether the act was "in the course of duty". If it was a personal act outside duty, the victim must sue the official personally.

Points to verify

Whether the entity sued is a "state agency" under Section 4 of the Act and the relevant Royal Decree .
Whether the act was done "in the course of duty" or outside it, which decides the defendant under Sections 5 and 6 .
Whether another law sets a different rule for the type of official or agency involved.

This is research support. Verify against the official text of the law and apply your own legal judgment before relying on it.

Was this answer helpful?

Next steps

Similar casesCompare judgmentsIdentify legal issuesSummariseSupporting evidence

The answer is split under fixed headings, every point carries a citation, and it ends with what to verify.

Start over to see the upload and paste screen.

You

What should be checked (e.g. legality and legal risks of this contract)

AI assistant

Demo output: this page does not read your file. It shows the kind of report a full system produces for a services contract.

Services agreement: legal review

Mostly lawful, with three clauses that carry risk for the client. Suggested redlines are below.

Clause 9: Limitation of liabilityHigh

Excludes all liability of the provider, including for intentional or grossly negligent acts. A term that exempts liability for intent or gross negligence is likely to be unenforceable under the Unfair Contract Terms Act, B.E. 2540.

Suggested redline: Cap liability at the fees paid in the last 12 months, and state that the cap does not apply to intentional acts, gross negligence or breach of confidentiality.

Clause 12: Penalty for late deliveryMedium

A fixed penalty of 5% per day is likely to be treated as excessive. Under Section 383 of the Civil and Commercial Code the court may reduce a disproportionate penalty to a reasonable amount.

Suggested redline: Set the penalty at 0.1% of the contract price per day, capped at 10% of the price.

Clause 15: Personal dataMedium

The provider processes personal data but the contract has no data-processing terms, which the Personal Data Protection Act, B.E. 2562 expects between a controller and a processor.

Suggested redline: Add a data-processing clause: purpose, security measures, breach notice and deletion on exit.

Clause 18: Governing lawLow

Thai law and the Thai courts are chosen, which is consistent with the parties and the place of performance.

Suggested redline: No change needed. Consider adding arbitration if both parties prefer it.

This is research support. Verify against the official text of the law and apply your own legal judgment before relying on it.

Each finding names the clause, its risk level and the wording the reviewer could use instead.

Switch to ไทย to read the same checklist in Thai.

You

What licences and laws apply to opening a restaurant in Bangkok?

AI assistant

Summary

A restaurant needs a licence for the food premises, a building that may lawfully be used for the purpose, tax registration, and compliance with labour and social security rules.

Obligations and licences

Food premises: a business that may harm health needs a local licence under the Public Health Act, B.E. 2535, and the Bangkok ordinance made under it .
Food safety: food sold must meet the standards of the Food Act, B.E. 2522 .
Building: the premises must be permitted for this use, with fire safety in place, under the Building Control Act, B.E. 2522 .
Alcohol: selling alcohol needs its own licence and follows the sale-hours and place rules of the Alcohol Control Act, B.E. 2551 .
Tax: register for VAT once revenue passes the threshold, and pay the signboard tax if a sign is displayed .
Staff: register employees with Social Security and follow the Labour Protection Act, B.E. 2541 .

Authorities

Bangkok district office and the BMA Department of Health (premises licence).
Thai FDA and local health officers (food standards).
The Revenue Department and the Social Security Office.

Penalties

Penalties differ by statute and range from fines to closure orders. Confirm them in the penalty chapter of each Act.

Points to verify

Current thresholds, fees and the exact licence name under the latest BMA ordinance.
Whether foreign shareholding triggers the Foreign Business Act.

This is research support. Verify against the official text of the law and apply your own legal judgment before relying on it.

Was this answer helpful?

Next steps

Similar casesCompare judgmentsIdentify legal issuesSummariseSupporting evidence

One list of obligations, authorities and penalties for a business or project.

Click a Next steps chip, or start over for the other example.

You

The buyer paid for land but the seller refused to register the transfer and sold it to someone else.

AI assistant

Issue

What can a buyer do after paying for land when the seller will not register the transfer and has sold the land to a third party?

Governing principles

A sale of land is void unless it is in writing and registered with the competent official. Until registration, ownership does not pass .
A written promise to sell, or one backed by a deposit or part payment, can be enforced by asking the court to order the seller to perform .
A buyer who has not registered generally cannot assert the right against a third party who bought in good faith and registered .
Money paid can be claimed back, with damages for the breach .

Supporting judgments

Demo sample: judgments are not included here. A full system retrieves them from its case library.

Likely outcome (not a ruling)

Depends on the facts. If the third party has already registered in good faith, the buyer will most likely recover money and damages rather than the land. If the land is still in the seller's name, an order forcing the transfer is realistic.

Points to verify

Whether there is a signed written agreement, a deposit or part payment, and what the buyer paid.
Whether the third party knew of the first sale, which affects good faith .
Limitation periods, and whether to register a claim on the land quickly.

This is research support. Verify against the official text of the law and apply your own legal judgment before relying on it.

Was this answer helpful?

Next steps

Similar casesCompare judgmentsIdentify legal issuesSummariseSupporting evidence

The outcome is a tendency, never a ruling, and the points that could change it are listed.

What comes next?

From demo to pilot to production.

This page is the concept and working demo. Pilot scope, data, budget and timeline are agreed only after the agencies have seen it.

Done
Issue and problem
The scope areas this solution covers.
We are here
Concept and working demo
This page, with sample answers.
Next
Review and refine
Adjust as more information arrives.
Then
Stakeholder walkthrough
Validate the problem, data and needs.
Then
Pilot definition
Scope, data, integrations, criteria, budget, timeline.

Demo

Now

Show the idea working, so stakeholders react to something concrete.

This page with working screens
Pre-written sample answers
Walkthrough for the agencies

Output: a stakeholder-ready demo.

Pilot

One team and an agreed set of real approved materials, alongside today's process.

Load and prepare the approved materials
Language model for answer wording, citations kept
Real sign-in, roles and retained logs
Success measures agreed before the start

Output: a scoped pilot with agreed measures.

Production

Later

More teams and sources on the same platform, run and supported.

Connections to document and case systems
Hosting that meets security rules
Monitoring, support and model updates

Output: a supported service.

Measures to agree for the pilotTime to find a referenceAnswers with a valid sourceReview time per documentAnswers with a valid citation

Built for legal work

Trust and honesty about what this is.

A legal team will ask where an answer came from and who saw what. The design answers that from the start.

This page is a demo

The workspace here replays pre-written sample answers in the real interface. A working system answers from a language model and a legal library.

Sample answers, not legal advice

The samples cite real Thai statutes. They are short demonstrations and must be checked against the official text.

The AI drafts, people decide

Nothing is relied on until a legal professional has checked the source and accepted it.

Every answer shows its sources

Each answer lists the sections and judgments it relies on, and ends with the points to verify.

AI Legal Assistant. Next: a pilot definition.

Review the demo with your team.Tell us what a pilot must prove.

Contact UPSPIRE Back to the workspace

The answers on this page are pre-written demonstrations, not legal advice. Verify against the official text of the law. This page is not an official system of any agency.

AI Legal Assistant, answers with sources.

Codified law

Thai first

Personal data rules

Courts and prosecutors

Legal research

Document analysis

Regulatory compliance

Case analysis

From a question to a cited answer

Asks in plain words

Finds the sections

Writes from the sources

Checks the sources

Research on file

Legal sources

Data layer

Intelligence

What people use

What would you like to research today?

Examples

Legal officers

Contract and document reviewers

Compliance and project teams

Lawyers who sign off

Issue

Applicable law

Analysis

Supporting judgments

Contrasting judgments

Likely tendency (not a ruling)

Points to verify

Services agreement: legal review

Summary

Obligations and licences

Authorities

Penalties

Points to verify

Issue

Governing principles

Supporting judgments

Likely outcome (not a ruling)

Points to verify

Issue and problem

Concept and working demo

Review and refine

Stakeholder walkthrough

Pilot definition

This page is a demo

Sample answers, not legal advice

The AI drafts, people decide

Every answer shows its sources

AI Legal Assistant. Next: a pilot definition.